UPC Litigation
Our European Patent Attorneys and Attorneys-at-law, registered as UPC representatives, act in this capacity for both claimants and defendants in all types of actions falling within the jurisdiction of the Court: infringement actions, revocation actions, actions for declarations of non-infringement, provisional measures, seizures, claims for damages, etc.
Thanks to their dual technical and legal expertise, our team offers an integrated and tailored approach, perfectly aligned with the specific challenges of each case.
The Unitary Patent system offers the unique possibility to obtain, enforce and invalidate patents in all EU member states in central proceedings at the Unified Patent Court (UPC). The potential rewards for patent proprietors are substantial, but so are the associated risks.
At CASALONGA, we have been actively involved in the UPC’s development for many years. Our team – composed of European patent attorneys and experienced litigators – has advised legislators, taken part in working groups, and thoroughly prepared for the new system.
Most of our attorneys are qualified to act before the UPC and are proud to represent clients before the Court, ensuring full compliance and seamless representation.
Integrated Legal & Technical Expertise
We strategically pair our attorneys-at-law with European patent attorneys on each case to deliver both legal precision and deep technical insight. With teams based in France and Germany, we tailor our approach to each case’s jurisdictional and technological complexity.
Mastery of UPC Procedure
Our team includes professionals who contributed to shaping the UPC and its Rules of Procedure. This insider knowledge ensures we can navigate the procedural nuances of the central, local, and regional divisions with confidence and precision.
Local Presence Where It Matters
With offices in Paris, Munich, and Düsseldorf, we are ideally positioned to represent clients before the most active divisions of the UPC.
What is the UPC?
UPC in a nutshell
- - The UPC has exclusive jurisdiction to decide on infringement and validity of European patents and Unitary patents: the UPC replaces the national courts for European patents.
- - During a transitional period of 7 years, it is still possible to choose either the UPC or the national courts.
- - Opt out: during the transitional period, it is possible to register, for a specific European patent application or a specific European patent, a declaration that only national courts shall be competent for this European patent application or European patent, during the entire life of the patent.
- - The opt out may be withdrawn at any time under certain conditions.
For more information, visit also the official website of the Unified Patent Court.
The UPC system is undeniably complex, with a multitude of interconnected elements. Our UPC visual guide breaks the complexity down and provides an easy-to-understand graphic overview over all important proceedings, including relevant timelines.
Find our UPC visual guide here.
Explore the UPC with Our Interactive Code
To support businesses, lawyers, and patent professionals navigating the new system, we’ve developed an Interactive UPC Code - a dynamic tool that makes the complex UPC framework accessible and easy to understand.
It offers interactive browsing with 4 main features:
- - Cross-references between all Rules and Articles for quick and easy reading in the three official languages (English, French, and German),
- - Case law directly linked to the relevant Rules and Articles,
- - Commentaries on the most important Rules and Articles,
- - Keywords search on the texts, commentaries, and decisions.
The Interactive Code is freely available upon registration and designed to facilitate the consultation and understanding of the UPC texts and decisions.
Access the Interactive UPC Code on www.upc-casalonga.eu.

-
Arnaud Casalonga
• Litigation
• Pre-litigation and Enforcement Proceeding
• Strategy, licensing and valuation of IP rights
-
Caroline Casalonga
• Litigation
• Food Law
• Wine Law
• Pre-litigation and Enforcement Proceeding
• Trademark, design and domain name prosecution
• Strategy, licensing and valuation of IP rights
-
Marianne Gabriel
• Litigation
• Pre-litigation and Enforcement Proceeding
• Strategy, licensing and valuation of IP rights
-
Floriane Codevelle
• Litigation
• Antitrust & Competition Law
• Pre-litigation and Enforcement Proceeding
• Strategy, licensing and valuation of IP rights
-
Jean-Baptiste Lecœur
• Chemistry and Pharmaceuticals
• Litigation
• Strategy, licensing and valuation of IP rights
-
Benjamin Grzimek
• Litigation
• Pre-litigation and Enforcement Proceeding
• Strategy, licensing and valuation of IP rights
-
Jürgen Neugebauer
• Electronics & NICT
• Mechanical/Electronics
-
Olivier Delprat
• Electronics & NICT
• Mechanical/Electronics
• Litigation
-
Virginie Martin-Charbonneau
• Chemistry and Pharmaceuticals
• Litigation
-
Ghislain de Trémiolles
• Electronics & NICT
• Litigation
-
Augustin Le Tourneau
• Electronics & NICT
• Litigation
-
Julien Thon
• Mechanical/Electronics
• Litigation
-
Gwennhaël Le Roy
• Chemistry and Pharmaceuticals
• Litigation
-
Axel Casalonga
• Mechanical/Electronics
• Litigation
-
Patricia Ledrut
• Mechanical/Electronics
-
Véronique Marcadé
• HealthTech and Life sciences
• Litigation
-
Hélène Leblois-Préhaud
• HealthTech and Life sciences
• Litigation
-
Jean-Baptiste Dupont
• Electronics & NICT
• Litigation
-
Jörn Peters
• Litigation
• Pre-litigation and Enforcement Proceeding
• Strategy, licensing and valuation of IP rights
-
Mathieu Sagnes
• Electronics & NICT
• Mechanical/Electronics
-
Aurélien Tourteau
• Chemistry and Pharmaceuticals
-
Thomas Boucheteau
• Chemistry and Pharmaceuticals
-
Isabelle Caillet
• Chemistry and Pharmaceuticals
-
Laurent Markvoort
• Electronics & NICT
• Mechanical/Electronics
-
Robin Mangin
• Electronics & NICT
-
Simon Urosevic
• Electronics & NICT
-
Jérémie Rioufreyt
• Electronics & NICT
• Mechanical/Electronics
-
Nathan Audinet
• Litigation
• Pre-litigation and Enforcement Proceeding