WIPO - Bal du Moulin Rouge v. litigious domain names
Decision date
2025-12-31
Decision No.
D2024-5077 dated 29/01/2025; D2024-5080 dated 31/01/2025; D2024-5271 dated 14/03/2025; D2025-0735 dated 16/04/2025; DME2025-0013 dated 29/07/2025; D2025-2410 dated 11/08/2025; DAU2025-0025 dated 17/09/2025; D2025-3114 dated 23/09/2025; D2025-3488 dated 08/10/2025; D2025-3687 dated 23/10/2025; D2025-4344 dated 05/12/2025; D2025-4573 dated 05/01/2026
Nature
Domain names
Jurisdiction
World Intellectual Property Organization
References
D2024-5077 dated 2025/01/29; D2024-5080 dated 2025/01/31; D2024-5271 dated 2025/03/14; D2025-0735 dated 2025/04/16; DME2025-0013 dated 2025/07/29; D2025-2410 dated 2025/08/11; DAU2025-0025 dated 2025/09/17; D2025-3114 dated 2025/09/23; D2025-3488 dated 2025/10/08; D2025-3687 dated 2025/10/23; D2025-4344 dated 2025/12/05; D2025-4573 dated 2026/01/05;
Parties
Bal du Moulin Rouge v. litigious domain names
Bal du Moulin Rouge was represented by Pascaline Vincent, attorney-at-law at the Toulouse Bar.
We ensure the monitoring of the Bal du Moulin Rouge trademarks among domain names registered by third parties and, among the UDRP proceedings initiated in 2025 on behalf of the Bal du Moulin Rouge, obtained 12 favorable UDRP decisions, achieving a 100% success rate, thus rewarding the strategy put in place by Bal du Moulin Rouge and the combined efforts of its legal department and our teams.