French Competition Authority, practices implemented in the marketing of Côtes de Gascogne PGI wines
New penalty imposed by the competition authority on two companies for practices aimed at imposing resale price levels on wine distributors
You will find here a selection of decisions of the French Courts, of the European patent Office (EPO) and of the European Union Intellectual property Office(EUIPO). Various teams of CASALONGA were involved in some of the cases handled. Other cases are quoted here in view of their particular importance.
New penalty imposed by the competition authority on two companies for practices aimed at imposing resale price levels on wine distributors
Can an alcoholic beverage containing beer be marketed as a “aromatized wine product cocktail”?
LEROY MERLIN was represented by Arnaud CASALONGA, assisted by Juliette DIONSI, attorneys-at-law.
In a judgement issued on February 21st, 2022, the Paris Commercial Court condemned LEROY MERLIN and its supplier and manufacturer ALLDIFFUSION on the basis of unfair competition after REFLECTIV, which had been dereferenced by LEROY MERLIN, accused them of having copied the new packaging for its adhesive window films, which included a graphic charter, color codes, an installation kit, and an instructions manual.
The Court, however, dismissed REFLECTIV’s claims based on parasitism and ordered ALLDIFFUSION, which was declared to be in court-ordered liquidation to indemnify LEROY MERLIN against all liability.
REFLECTIV appealed against the judgement and LEROY MERLIN cross appealed.
On March 22nd, 2024, the Paris Court of Appeal rejected all REFLECTIV’s claims concerning both unfair competition (judgement overturned) and parasitism (judgement upheld).