Articles

"How patents are enforced in France? Questions & Answers"

Contributor: Caroline Casalonga, Casalonga Avocats.

Lire l’article

This article first appeared in Patents in Europe 2013/2014, a supplement to Intellectual Asset Management, published by The IP Media Group. To view the issue in full, please go to www.iam-magazine.com.

"How and when to bring a case before the UPC Central Division"

Author: Axel Casalonga, Casalonga & Associés.

Read the article

This article first appeared in Patents in Europe 2013/2014, a supplement to Intellectual Asset Management, published by The IP Media Group. To view the issue in full, please go to www.iam-magazine.com.

"Patents enforcement proceedings in France"

Author: Gérard Dossmann, Casalonga & Associés

Reproduced with permission from Law Business Research Ltd. This article was first published in Getting the Deal Through – Patents 2013, (published in March 2013; contributing editor: Stuart J Sinder of Kenyon & Kenyon LLP). For further information please visit www.GettingTheDealThrough.com

Read the article

No unconditional right to have evidence submitted out of time taken into account

In Dorma GmbH & Co KG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) (Case T-500/10, November 16 2011), the General Court has upheld a decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM finding that there was no ...

Authors: Karina Dimidjian-Lecomte and Cristina Bercial-Chaumier

WTR Daily, November 29, 2011

"Interpretation and determination of the scope of patents by the French Courts"

Contribution of Gérard Dossmann in "Patent Practice in Japan and Europe: Liber Amicorum for Guntram Rahn" - Edited by Bernd Hansen, Dirk Schüssler-Langeheine

See the article

"Air France’s new logo held to lack distinctive character"

In Société Air France v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) (Case T-159/10, April 13 2011), the General Court has upheld a decision of the Board of Appeal of OHIM in which ...

Authors: Caroline Casalonga and Cristina Bercial-Chaumier

WTR Daily, May 6, 2011

Word element with low level of distinctiveness not necessarily negligible

In Lan Airlines SA v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (OHIM) (Case T-194/09, February 8 2011), the General Court has upheld a decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM in which the latter had held that there was no likelihood of confusion between ...

Authors: Karina Dimidjian-Lecomte and Cristina Bercial-Chaumier

WTR Daily, March 1st, 2011

New Rules have been applied at the EPO since April 1st, 2010 on some important aspects of the prosecution of European patent applications.

The main changes relate to the search procedure, the answer to the European search report and the prosecution of divisional applications.

Further information